Oppositional Debate - Best Conclusions

Points awarded

50% of debate points will be awarded based on the strength of each side's arguments and quality of evidence. These points will be awarded and submitted prior to the conclusion portion of the debate.
50% of debate points will be awarded based on the strength of each side's final conclusions. The conclusions can be based on either the opposition's positions or the team's positions. These points will be awarded and submitted at the end of the debate.
The judge's review will be given after all the points are submitted.

Opening Statements: Each team or individual has a set amount of time to present their argument (e.g., 6-7 minutes).
Rebuttal Speeches: After opening statements, rebuttal rounds follow to address points made by opponents.
Cross-Examination: Teams question each other with time limits (e.g., 3 minutes per round).
Closing Statements: Debaters summarize their points and offer final conclusions on their side of the issue.

Proponents' strong arguments: List the proponent's' arguments that should be kept in mind.
Proponents' weak arguments: List the proponent's' arguments that need deeper consideration or need to be reconsidered and why.
Oppositions' strong arguments: List the opposition's arguments that should be kept in mind.
Oppositions' weak arguments: List the opposition's arguments that need deeper consideration or need to be reconsidered and why.
Summarize: Summarize the three to five biggest conclusions you draw from the debate. The purpose of this half is not to win the argument, but draw the best conclusions that you deduce from both sides of the debate.

Speech Time: Each debater has a fixed time to speak (e.g., 5-10 minutes), with penalties for exceeding it.
Cross-Examination Time: Time limits apply for questioning the opponent (e.g., 3 minutes per round).
Timekeepers: There should be an official timer to signal when time is up.

Argumentation: Strength, depth, and logic of the arguments presented.
Evidence: Use of credible, reliable sources to support arguments.
Refutation: Ability to address and weaken the opponent’s arguments.
Clarity and Delivery: Speaking clearly and persuasively, with attention to non-verbal communication.
Style and Poise: Presenting oneself professionally and with composure under pressure.

Citation Rules: Debaters must cite their sources correctly. Plagiarism or fabricating sources results in disqualification.
Use of Sources: Ensure sources are relevant, credible, and appropriately cited.
No Overloading: Focus on quality over quantity of evidence presented.

Respectful Behavior: Avoid personal attacks or inflammatory language.
Adherence to Rules: Debaters must follow the format, time limits, and ethical guidelines.
No Interruptions: Debaters should not interrupt unless during cross-examination.

Moderator: A moderator ensures the debate runs smoothly, enforces time limits, and resolves disputes.
Flow of Debate: Ensure that arguments progress logically, with time for rebuttals and responses.

Topic Allocation: Topics should be assigned in advance for adequate preparation time.
Preparedness: Teams should be ready to argue both sides of the issue.

Team Roles: Divide responsibilities clearly among team members.
Speaker Roles: Assign specific roles for each round (e.g., first speaker, second speaker, etc.).

Resolution of Disputes: A clear process should be in place for handling any disagreements during the debate.
Appeal Process: Teams should have a method for appealing decisions if needed.

Fair Play: Engage in fair play, avoiding deception and unethical tactics.
No Disruption: Teams should avoid distracting or disrupting the flow of the debate.

Technical Guidelines: Ensure participants have a stable internet connection and proper equipment.
Camera Use: Debaters should have their cameras on during the debate for accountability.