☰
Login
Search
Debates
Forums
Reference
Idea Heap
Debates
Benefits
Debate Rules
Administrators
Planning Guide
Planning Form
Contestant App
Judge App
Evaluation
Associated Websites
Boldpost (Research)
Sage Notes (Publications)
Saxemi (Education)
Tikitong (Journalism)
×
Main Menu
Login
Search
Debates
Forums
Reference
Idea Heap
Debates
Benefits
Debate Rules
Administrators
Planning Guide
Planning Form
Contestant App
Judge App
Evaluation
Associated Websites
Boldpost (Research)
Sage Notes (Publications)
Saxemi (Education)
Tikitong (Journalism)
Judge's Evaluation Form
Debate Round
Debate Topic/Resolution
Debating Teams
Judge's Name
Evaluation Criteria
Content/Argumentation
Clarity of Position
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Relevance of Arguments
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Depth and Logic
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Refutation of Opponent’s Arguments
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Organization
Structure of the Speech
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Clarity of Arguments
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Time Management
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Delivery
Clarity of Speech
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Engagement and Confidence
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Tone and Pace
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Body Language
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Use of Evidence and Sources
Quality and Relevance of Evidence
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Integration of Evidence
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Persuasiveness
Overall Effectiveness
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Ability to Appeal to the Audience
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Closing Arguments
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Teamwork and Collaboration
Team Coordination
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Support and Refutation
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Overall Assessment
Winner
Rationale for Winner
Suggestions for Improvement
Final Comments
Submit Evaluation
Photo by
Mohamed Marey
on
Unsplash